Business Law I

Running Head : BUSINESS LAW 1Business impartiality 1[Name of Author][University /Institution]Business police force 1Case 1In the case of Greenlee Smithe , it would be impossible to disaffirm the resolution that he had with the Benz head teacher . First of all it had been a couple of weeks since the distill had been do and was effective that day . The Benz monger had also through with(p) his or her part of the contract and had given Greenlee the metallic green Benz that he cute in the first place . A contract can non be disaffirmed because one party decided that he precious something else especially when the other party had already done his or her part of the learnment and the affectivity of the contract had startedThe second thing is that Greenlee was up to(p) to use the gondola for a couple of weeks and he modulate non hing wrong with the product aside from its glossinessing . Of dish out the value of the motorcar is not the same as it was forward It cannot be considered as spic-and-span anymore and the value significant has depreciated . The contract that Greenlee had can be void totally if the atomic number 82 checks , something that is authoritatively not possible . Either way Greenlee is received to lose the case because he is the one who does not do his part of the contractOn the other hand , if Greenlee treasured to modify the color so bad he can have it repainted and yield the appropriate cost . Also he can return key the car to the dealer in exchange for a recent one provided that he constitutes the depreciation value of the car and upon the clap of the dealer . In for Greenlee to achieve the color that he wanted , he is sure to buckle under for it and it is not a landed estate of the dealer to make such changes because he or she had already done his or her part of the contract .

Besides , the dealer will not force Greenlee to buy the car that he do not want and Greenlee sure wanted the car before the contract had been signedA contract cannot be easily change if one wishes to do so . Both parties must agree to void the said contract . Also , when the contract had interpreted effect for a long time , it can only when be void if one of the parties involved was unable to do his or her part of the contract but any revenge done will be his or her responsibilityCase 2It the case of go Chandler , since there had been another party that is involved , who has the obligation to pay Chandler for the work and service that he rendered ? Is it Palmer Courtlandt who is originally involved in the contract or Joseph Martin who had received the service of ChandlerPalmer is absolutely not responsible for paying Chandler although he was the one that is involved in the contract since he does not received the service that is in the contract...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay